Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
The Asheville Program
John Miall
2
It’s the System That Needs Care
  • Over half of all healthcare
    via managed care
  • Largest increase in 6 years
    in costs
  • It’s evolution not revolution
  • Giving patients the resources to
    be well
  • Buy VALUE
  • Taiwanese healthcare system
3
Frequency/Severity Matrix
4
UN-Managing Care
  • “Kaiser physicians know what things need
    to be done for diabetic patients, but due
    to the constraints of modern medical practice they seldom have the time to do them….”
    •   Managed Care News 1999 Apr.
  • “Ultimately, all care is managed by patients.”
    •   Dan Garrett, Exec. Dir. NCAP
5
Diabetes-Related Comorbidities
  • 2–4 times greater risk of heart disease
  • 60–65% have hypertension
  • 2–4 times greater risk of stroke
  • 60–70% have some degree of nervous
    system damage
  • Leading cause of adult blindness
  • Leading cause of ESRD (40% new cases)
  • >50% lower limb amputations
6
Diabetes-Related Indirect Costs
  • 8.3 sick-leave days annually
  • 1.7 sick-leave days for employees
    without diabetes
  • $47 billion in productivity forgone
    due to disability, absence, and
    premature mortality
7
In the Beginning
  • “Partnering” with physicians, hospital system, NCAPh, NCCPC, UNC School of Pharmacy
  • Invitation to all pharmacists in community
  • Responses of independents vs. chains
  • Two weekends (32 hours) of training by physicians and diabetes educators
  • Compensation after results
  • Fee schedule
  • $2,400 first year, ongoing average of $48.02 per monthly visit through 2002.
8
Patient Incentives and Care Model
  • Patient selection / recruitment
  • Patient education — Mission + St. Joseph’s Diabetes Center
  • Matching patients to pharmacists
  • Incentives:
    • Labs without co-pays
    • Glucose meters
    • PBM co-pay waivers
  • The operative word in health care is “care”  (Madge testimonial)
9
How They Do It
  • “Patient making better food choice. Blood glucose
    much improved. 2 x 1.5c cm wound RLE. Referred
    to physician for evaluation and therapy.”
10
  APPROPRIATE MEDICATION
11
Clinical Outcomes:
Avg. Glycosylated Hemoglobin
12
City of Asheville Total Diabetes Medical Costs
13
Direct Medical Costs Over Time1
 1Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The Asheville Project: Long-term clinical and economic outcomes of a community pharmacy diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;43:173-84.
14
Average Annual Diabetic Sick-Leave Usage (COA)
15
Sick Leave Usage By Time In Program
16
DIABETES IN WORK FORCE
  • Average of 1000 employees over 5 years
  • 60 to 100 diabetics expected
  • 32 = average annual percentage of workers with lost time injuries for 5 years
  • 1.97 to 3.2 = expected number of lost time injured workers in average year with diabetes
17
CITY INDEMNITY INJURIES BY YEAR
18
DIABETES MANAGEMENT INDEMNITY CASES
19
Patient Self-Management Programsm
  • Baseline A1c = 7.9
  • Visit 1 Percentages
    • Influenza Vaccination
      • 40% current
    • Foot Exam
      • 28% current
    • Eye Exam
      • 34% current
    • Blood Pressure
      • 73% current
    • Lipid Profile
      • 49% current

  • A1c @ 10 months = 7.1
  • Visit 6 Percentages
    • Influenza Vaccination
      • 75% current
    • Foot Exam
      • 80% current
    • Eye Exam
      • 80% current
    • Blood Pressure
      • 92% current
    • Lipid Profile
      • 94% current

20
Clinical – HEDIS 2003 Indicators
  …Averages through 25-Sep-04 (n=256)
  • NCQA Commercial Accredited Plans
    • A1c Testing = 85%
    • A1c Control (< 9) = 68%
    • Lipid Profile = 88%
    • Lipid Control (< 130) = 60%
    • Lipid Control (< 100) = 31%
    • Flu Shots = 48%
    • Eye Exams = 49%

  • PSMP Pilot Sites – (Aggregate)
    • A1c Testing = 100%
    • A1c Control (< 9) = 94%
    • Lipid Profile = 100%
    • Lipid Control (< 130) = 78%
    • Lipid Control (< 100) = 49%
    • Flu Shots = 77%
    • Eye Exams = 82%

21
Humanistic – Pharmacist Care
  …Aggregate through 25-Apr-04
  • Overall Satisfaction with Diabetes care
    • Baseline survey (prior to enrollment)
      • 227 patients
      • 57% of responses 8 - 10

    • 6-month follow-up
      • 223 patients
      • 87% of responses 8 - 10

  • 10-point scale


22
Cycle of Incentive Alignment for Collaboration
23
Conclusions
  • Pharmacists have had the opportunity to
    serve on the frontline of patient care, and
    have made a difference.
  • Physicians with patients in the program
    have recognized the positive impact on care.
  • Collaboration plus innovation leads to
    reduced healthcare costs.
  • Employers benefit by lowering or
    eliminating barriers to care.